Snus exists in two very different forms. Traditional snus, which contains tobacco, has been banned in most countries outside of Sweden since the 90s. Modern snus, more commonly known as nicotine pouches, contain synthetic nicotine rather than tobacco-based nicotine. This overlap in terminology is where much of the confusion starts. Parents hear the word snus and, understandably, want to keep it as far from their children as possible.
But what happens when those children are edging into adulthood? At 18 or 19, they may still be kids in the eyes of their parents, but in the eyes of the law, they are full adults, legally entitled to make their own choices.
Snus is particularly popular among younger adults, and part of the reason is that this generation is arguably more aware than ever of the risks of inhaling fumes from smoking or vaping. Unlike cigarettes, snus does not require combustion or inhalation. For some, this makes it appear the smarter, safer option.
Yet the question remains, does that make it right? Nicotine is an addictive substance, even if it is not the substance itself that has historically caused the greatest harm. It is the method of consumption that has devastated lives. In this light, the side effects of modern snus are still more theoretical than proven, and that uncertainty is exactly why the debate continues.