The nicotine pouch market has been flooded with brands and products in recent years, particularly in Europe. The boom that stunned the vaping and smoking industry unleashed some of the major nicotine pouch players onto the scene. BAT pushed VELO into the market and has been challenged by Zyn, manufactured by Phillip Morris. Independent brands like Killa, and CUBA also tussle for shelf space, in what is shaping up to be a perpetual battle for market share.
BAT seemingly made several mistakes in the early stages of nicotine pouches. The fragmented history of the brand raised eyebrows due to the compartmentalised geo-specific naming of the same product initially. From EPOK to Lyft, to VELO, BAT forced many people to question what is VELO.
Despite the obvious early flaws, the unification of VELO into a singular, notable brand was a marketing stroke of genius. In a market that appeals to a younger, and dare I say it, younger generation of woke communities, VELO has seen success. The vibrant coloured cans, coupled with the enticing names of products, are two keys to popularity. VELO has a massive marketing budget that could rival some of the biggest spenders in product marketing. As such, you will be hard-pressed not to find one of the brands’ cans in your local supermarket or convenience store. The products themselves are as vibrant and appealing on a shelf of crowded nicotine pouches and vapes as they are online. There is something about the way VELO looks that has added a certain ‘class’ to using nicotine pouches. As the success of the brand continues to grow, so does the wave of independent brands in its slipstream.